Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Process

Students will meet with their committee in the fall no sooner than 1 year after the candidacy exam (via a staggered schedule created by the graduate office), students will be required to prepare a 1-page executive summary of research progress to date since the last examination.  Beyond research, this document should also include an “individual development plan” discussing future plans and strategies for personal and career development (approximately ¼ of the page).  In addition, students will be required to complete the PhD update form, documenting research papers, presentations, awards, conference proceedings, etc. earned to date in the program.  Both of these documents will be provided to committee members.  Students will meet with all committee members (either as a group or individually) to discuss annual progress and sign-off on PhD update form (typically <45 minutes).  GSC Committee members will assess the performance of the student based on the PhD update form in the form of “making excellent progress”, “making satisfactory progress” and “needs improvement.”  We expect that most students will be assessed as “making satisfactory progress.”  The PI and committee will communicate concerns and suggestions to the student. These signed documents will be provided to the graduate office.Forms and additional information will be forthcoming.passing candidacy. The graduate office will communicate a calendar of staggered deadlines to serve as the timeline for completing the submission of all paperwork for the Annual Review process.

 

Fall Semester

Spring Semester

Year 1

Coursework GPA requirement

 

Year 2

 

Candidacy

Year 3

 

 

Year 4

Annual Review

 

Year 5

 

Oral Defense

 

The student will complete an Executive Summary that includes an Individual Development Plan and the Annual Review Update Form. The advisor will approve of the materials and then the student will send these documents to the rest of their committee, in whichever format the committee prefers, such as over email. The committee will review these documents and submit feedback to the advisor. The advisor will collect the feedback and discuss it with the student. The student will then schedule meetings with the committee and send a follow up email to the committee summarizing the discussion. The student will then submit all documents to the graduate coordinator, who will file the annual review in the student’s file.

Timeline

Deadline

Student

Advisor

Committee

 

Create Executive Summary and complete Annual Review Form

 

 

 

Approve the Executive Summary and Annual Review Form

 

6 weeks before given deadline

Send Executive Summary and Annual Review Form to Committee

 

 

4 weeks before given deadline

 

 

Submit feedback of student’s work to advisor via electronic form sent by Graduate Coordinator

 

Discuss feedback

Discuss feedback

 

If feedback is “needs improvement,” create Improvement Action Plan

 

 

 

If feedback is “needs improvement,” approve Improvement Action Plan

 

2 weeks before given deadline

Schedule meeting(s) with Committee

 

 

Completed by given deadline

Meet to discuss student’s progress. Individual meetings should last approximately 15 minutes. Committee member signs the Annual Review Signature Page. If initial feedback was that the student needs improvement, a group meeting lasting no more than 45 minutes should be held. In the group meeting the student presents their Improvement Action Plan with concrete metrics and clear timeline for 10-15 minutes. The committee then provides feedback on the Improvement Action Plan. After all comments, the committee signs twice on the Annual Review Signature Page, once to confirm meeting with the student and again to approve the Improvement Action Plan. Committee members should rank the student’s work as “exceeds expectations,” “meets expectations,” or “needs improvement,” based on the original review of the Executive Summary and Annual Review Form. That is, the committee should rank the student’s work consistently with the feedback originally submitted to the advisor.

 

Send a single summary email of meeting discussion to committee. If meetings were individual, email should contain a summary of all meetings. If student created Improvement Action Plan, email should summarize discussion and any additions to Plan.

 

 

Submit all paperwork (listed below) to Graduate Program Coordinator

 

 

Lynda.com

Lynda.com is an online learning platform that helps anyone learn business, software, technology and creative skills to achieve personal and professional goals. You can login with your EID to learn a variety of skills, such as team management, that will help you through your career path. This link will take you to the UT portal.

...