Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Because these tools draw in information from may disparate sources, they can be very difficult to install, configure, use, and maintain. For example, the vcf files from the 1000 Genomes project are arranged in a deep ftp tree by date of data generation. Large genome centers spend significant resources managing these tools. Our objective

Pre-packaged programs

Annovar - one of the

...

most powerful yet simple to run variant annotators available

Annovar is a variant annotator. Given a vcf file from an unknown sample and a host of existing data about genes, other known SNPs, gene variants, etc., Annovar will place the discovered variants in context.

...

Code Block
titleCreate the submission script and submit
launcher_creator.py -l annovar.sge -n annovar -t 00:30:00 -j commands
qsub annovar.sge

While Annovar is running, We have ALREADY pre-computed these outputs (although Annovar will run pretty quickly on data from only chr20).  You might want to have a look at the code to annovar_pipe.sh summarize and summarize_annovar.pl.  Note that these run Annovar in "gene-based" mode.

Expand
If you want a hint, here's a fast way to look at the code to a script
If you want a hint, here's a fast way to look at the code to a script
Code Block
titlePrint out the text of the bash script annovar_pipe.sh
more `which annovar_pipe.sh`
Code Block
titlePrint out the text of the perl script summarize_annovar.pl
more `which summarize_annovar.pl`

(Note the ` characters are "backtick", not apostrophe)

ANNOVAR output

Annovar does a ton of work in assessing variants for us (though if you were going for clinical interpretation, you still have a long way to go - compare this to RUNES or CarpeNovo).  It provides all these output files:

Code Block
titleExample ANNOVAR output on the NA12878 vcf file
NA12878.chrom20.samtools.vcf.exome_summary.csv
NA12878.chrom20.samtools.vcf.exonic_variant_function
NA12878.chrom20.samtools.vcf.genome_summary.csv
NA12878.chrom20.samtools.vcf.hg19_ALL.sites.2010_11_dropped
NA12878.chrom20.samtools.vcf.hg19_ALL.sites.2010_11_filtered
NA12878.chrom20.samtools.vcf.hg19_avsift_dropped
NA12878.chrom20.samtools.vcf.hg19_avsift_filtered
NA12878.chrom20.samtools.vcf.hg19_esp5400_all_dropped
NA12878.chrom20.samtools.vcf.hg19_esp5400_all_filtered
NA12878.chrom20.samtools.vcf.hg19_genomicSuperDups
NA12878.chrom20.samtools.vcf.hg19_ljb_all_dropped
NA12878.chrom20.samtools.vcf.hg19_ljb_all_filtered
NA12878.chrom20.samtools.vcf.hg19_phastConsElements46way
NA12878.chrom20.samtools.vcf.hg19_snp132_dropped
NA12878.chrom20.samtools.vcf.hg19_snp132_filtered
NA12878.chrom20.samtools.vcf.log
NA12878.chrom20.samtools.vcf.variant_function

I find the exome_summary.csv to be one of the most useful files because it brings together nearly all the useful information.  Here are the fields in that file:

 

Func
Gene
ExonicFunc
AAChange (in gene coordinates)
Conserved (i.e. SNP is in a conserved region)
SegDup (snp is in a segmental dup. region)
ESP5400_ALL
1000g2010nov_ALL
dbSNP132
AVSIFT
LJB_PhyloP
LJB_PhyloP_Pred
LJB_SIFT
LJB_SIFT_Pred
LJB_PolyPhen2
LJB_PolyPhen2_Pred
LJB_LRT
LJB_LRT_Pred
LRT_MutationTaster
LRT_MutationTaster_Pred
LJB_GERP++
Chr
Start
End
Ref
Obs
SNP Quality value
filter information
DP=raw read depth, VDB= variant distance bias (might be a problem with RNA seq calls), RPB=read position bias (since early/late bp in a read may be worse), AF1=Max-likelihood estimate of the first ALT allele frequency (assuming HWE), HWE=Chi^2 based HWE test P-value based on G3, AC1=Max-likelihood estimate of the first ALT allele count (no HWE assumption), DP4=# high-quality ref-forward bases, ref-reverse, alt-forward and alt-reverse bases, MQ=Root-mean-square mapping quality of covering reads, FQ=Phred probability of all samples being the same, PV4=P-values for strand bias, baseQ bias, mapQ bias and tail distance bias
GT:PL:GQ for each file!

Other variant annotators:

...