Each academic year after the candidacy exam (via a staggered schedule to be created by the graduate office), students will be required to prepare a 1 page executive summary of research progress to date since the last examination. Beyond research, this document should also include an “individual development plan” discussing future plans and strategies for personal and career development (approximately ¼ of the page). In addition, students will be required to complete the PhD update form, documenting research papers, presentations, awards, conference proceedings, etc. earned to date in the program. Both of these documents will be provided to committee members. Students will meet with all committee members (either as a group or individually) to discuss annual progress and sign-off on PhD update form (typically <45 minutes). GSC Committee members will assess the performance of the student based on the PhD update form in the form of “making excellent progress”, “making satisfactory progress” and “needs improvement”. We expect that most students will be assessed as “making satisfactory progress”. The PI and committee will communicate concerns and suggestions to the student. These signed documents will be provided to the graduate office.
Forms and additional information will be forthcoming.
Lynda.com is an online learning platform that helps anyone learn business, software, technology and creative skills to achieve personal and professional goals. You can login with your EID to learn a variety of skills, such as team management, that will help you through your career path. This link will take you to the UT portal.
Abstracts and Executive Summaries, Engineering Communication Program, University of Toronto, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering
Writing the Executive Summary, Effective Writing Center, University of Maryland-University College
Executive Summaries, CSU Writing Guide, Colorado State University
Guidelines for Writing an Executive Summary, Plant Science Center
Individual Development Plan Resources, Graduate School, UW-Madison
My IDP, Science Careers, American Association for the Advancement of Science
Mentoring Resources, Graduate Mentoring Guidebook, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Individual Development Plan, Department of Science, Purdue College of Science
Adviser, Teacher, Role Model, Friend: On Being a Mentor to Students in Science and Engineering, National Academy Press (1997)
S.G. Brainard and L. Ailes-Sengers, "Mentoring Female Engineering Students: A Model Program at the University of Washington," Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 1 (1994): 123-135
Barbara E. Lovitts, Making the Implicit Explicit: Creating Performance Expectations for the Dissertation (Sterling, VA: Stylus), 2007.
SMART Goals from MindTools
"Time Management for Scholars," presentation offered regularly by the UT Austin University Writing Center
Setting Meaningful, Challenging Goals from MindTools
Locke, Edwin A. and Gary P. Latham, "New Directions in Goal-Setting Theory," Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15/5 (2006).
Dweck, Carol S. Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York: Ballantine Books, 2008.
Duckworth, Angela. Grit: The Power of Passion and Perserverance. New York: Scribner, 2016.
Zenger, Jack and Joseph Folkman, "Your Employees Want the Negative Feedback You Hate to Give," Harvard Business Review, January 15, 2014
Style Under Stress Assessment, Crucial Conversations by VitalSmarts
Receiving and Giving Effective Feedback, Centre for Teaching Excellence, University of Waterloo
Hardavella, Georgia, Ane Aamli-Gaagnat, Neil Saad, Ilona Rousalova, and Katherina B. Sreter, "How to give and receive feedback effectively," Breath: The Resperatory Professional's Source for Continuing Medical Education 13/4 (2017): 327-333.
Singh, Manjet Kaur Mehar, "Graduate Students' Needs and Preferences for Written Feedback on Academic Writing," English Language Teaching 9/12 (2016).