image-20250307-151014.png

UPDTATE (on 6/10/2025): NEW IDEA SUBMISSION DEADLINE: AUGUST 8, 2025

Overview and Call for ideas

The Construction Industry Institute (CII) has developed an Integrated R&D Ideation Process to generate, develop, and prioritize research and development ideas. This process aims to maximize the value and impact of CII's initiatives for its members by fostering innovation and collaboration.

CII is now accepting ideas via an online form. These ideas should align with CII's Research and Development scope. They can include research ideas addressing opportunities and problems that lack clear and general solutions, or development topics that fit CII’s scope in terms of professional development or initiatives that can benefit from a concerted effort involving members from multiple organizations (for instance, past ideation session identified a need for the upcoming CII Bootcamp – an intro level course to CII practices, and the CII NextGen initiative).

Ultimately, these ideas are intended to improve the delivery of capital projects, making them safer, more cost-effective, and meeting expectations in terms of quality, sustainability, safety, etc, while also improving the performance of the delivery of individual projects. For an overview of past ideas that became R&D topics, see Appendix A.

By participating in CII's ideation process, members can significantly influence the direction of CII’s research and development efforts. This collaborative approach ensures that the most promising and impactful ideas are pursued, driving both transformational and incremental improvements in the delivery of capital projects.

The CII Ideation goal is to ensure that CII resources are used effectively to maximize value for members. Specific objectives include:

Ideas can be submitted any time using the online form (link below) here but individuals and groups are encouraged to read the sections below to better understand the process.

Online Form

Word document (you can use to prepare the topic before using the online form):

1.    Ideation Process

The CII Ideation process consists of four main steps:

image-20250303-225630.png

Idea Generation

Idea Evaluation

Idea Development:

Prioritization and Ranking: Ideas are evaluated and ranked during the CII Fall BOA meeting workshop.

 

3. Summary of idea generation

BOA Idea Generation Results (Updated on 4/22/2025)

On April 17, the CII Board of Advisors participated in a workshop that marked the beginning of our ideation process. The primary goal of the workshop was to capture an initial set of ideas and identify the overarching themes that the Board envisions for CII’s R&D initiatives for 2026. 

These ideas are now available for other groups to utilize. They may choose to further develop specific topics or use them as a starting point for their own brainstorming sessions. 

Question 

Category 

How can we automate the construction site to remove boots from the field? * 

 

Moonshot (Breakthrough) 

How do we substantially reduce the time of development from conception to delivery in half the time? * 

 

Moonshot 

How can we enhance PDRI to be customizable for sector-specific applications (Power, Energy, offshore, etc.) * 

PDRI Expansion 

Should we tailor or align PDRI to address the need of nuclear energy (SMR/Baseload) to optimize FEP and Readiness Assessment* 

PDRI Expansion 

How do we transition custom engineering design to design for manufacturing? 

Efficiency 

Why do we continue to experience challenges with change management even with the CII best practice? How do we accelerate impact quantification, value assessment, decision-making, and implementation? * 

Efficiency 

What are the core project management principles, practices and tools to focus on and scale up/down based on project size and complexity 

Efficiency 

How can a centralized integration function improve alignment, efficiency and value delivery across disciplines and phases in capital project execution. 

Efficiency 

How do we get the right data when and where it is needed to reduce project disruptions (vendor data) 

 

Efficiency 

How do we get the right data when and where it is needed to reduce project disruptions (vendor data) 

Efficiency 

How are other sectors attracting youth? 

Workforce 

After decades of the same workforce issues how can we shift to focus on the people-side of projects? Increase field superintendent and craft. 

Workforce 

Leveraging AI tools to set up best practices for site selection. 

AI / Tech development question 

What are "standard" AI tools that should be used while protecting proprietary information?  

 

AI / Tech development question 

How to evolve the supply chain to integrate with project objectives, reduce risks and Obtain buy-in with key stakeholders early in project? 

Collaboration / Integration 

How can we prioritize project collective outcomes over individual company profit in our contracting strategy? 

Risk / Risk sharing 

What contracting models are best for risk allocation? Which is better for project cost? 

Risk / Risk sharing 

*Ideas selected by the FSC to be further developed by the committee members. 

The FSC reviewed the ideas and elected to support the development of four of them. However, all these ideas have the potential to be further developed into topics and submitted via the online form before the July 15 deadline. We encourage CII groups and individuals to consider these ideas, at the very least, as a starting point for their own ideation sessions. 

During the BOA meeting, we surveyed the attendees with a set of thought-provoking questions. We captured the themes across the responses, processed the results using AI tools, and presented the results on the second day of the meeting. We also want to share these results here so other CII groups and individuals can see the themes the CII Board of Advisors had in mind. This can also assist CII groups in organizing their own workshops. 

Table: Unique Themes for Each Question 

If we were to completely reimagine project delivery from scratch, ignoring all current constraints and assumptions, what would it look like? 

What would success look like for project delivery in 10 years, and what's the biggest obstacle preventing us from achieving that vision? 

What would you do differently or focus on if you could start your career over, knowing what you know now? 

  • Radical simplification and standardization 

  • "Plug and play" modularization 

  • Fully integrated, seamless ecosystems 

  • Gamification of delivery 

  • Predictability and performance benchmarking as core success indicators  

  • Contracting models as barriers (outdated, adversarial structures)  

  • Culture of safety, fun, and mental health (human experience)  

  • Labor and skills shortages as a barrier 

  • Personal growth and leadership focus (character-driven leadership, mentorship, purposeful risk-taking) 

  • Earlier engagement with organizations like CII 

  • Broader exposure early in career (supply chain, business acumen, systems thinking) 

 

 

 

 We also presented the common themes observed across all questions: 

  1. Integration of Technology & AI 

  1. Standardization & Simplification 

  1. Collaborative, Aligned Delivery Models 

  1. Culture & Change Management 

  1. Workforce & Leadership Development 

  1. Data-Driven Performance & Predictability 

We appreciate the input from our Board of Advisors and would like to offer this to all members as a way to help their efforts to ideate new R&D topics. 

Submitted Ideas (Updated on 9/15/2024)

You can find a summary of the ideas submitted in 2025 here: Link to Summary of Submitted Ideas

The following table summarizes the submission by source:

Source

# Ideas

Individual (member)

4

Controls and Risk CBA

5

Safety CBA

3

Data Analytics

3

Modularization CBA

2

FSC (BOA Topic)

2

AWP CBA

2

XC

1

Supply Chain Management

1

Quality Management CBA

1

EIT Forum

1

Individual (non-member)

1

Grand Total

26

4. List of ideas selected in the evaluation step (TBD)

UPDATED 11/17/2025

(A) Enhancing Prevention through Design (PtD) via AWP

(B) Refreshing CII Best Practices and key tools for the modern project landscape

(C) Tailoring Front-End Planning and PDRI for the nuclear power segment

(D) Enhancing construction oversight to mitigate rework, delays, and cost overruns

(E) Cross-Industry lessons to advance capital project delivery

(F) Advancing digitalization of equipment and material information in capital projects

(G) An update of the CII Best Practices Guide [Development]

(H) Identifying and disseminating CII practices and tools that can be readily applicable to specific industry segments [Development]

5. Prioritized ideas (TBD)

UPDATED 11/17/2025

Appendices

Appendix A - Types of R&D Projects Sponsored by CII

Initiative Type

Notes

Example

Research Team (2 years)

Creates new knowledge addressing an opportunity for area for improvement. Supported by an academic under contract with CII, includes 15-20 industry experts.

Most CII RTs, including those that defined PDRI (RT-113), and AWP (RT-272)

Research Team (1-year)

Relatively clear and narrow scope with minimal time for wondering about the topic. E.g., update/expansion of an existing tool. Staffed with industry members and academics.

E.g., revamping of the PDCS tool (DCC-06), and the upcoming Project Control for AWP

Research team (6 months)

Shorter exploratory status. May be extended to investigate a narrowed topic. A good way to explore big opportunities.

AI for safety exploratory study (RT-422), supplier qualification program exploratory study (RT-413)

Workshop-based Initiative

Shorter (6-month) initiative where participants attend workshop(s) and a small core groups including an academic summarizes results.

TBD

Working group

Organizes existing knowledge in a fast-paced initiative. Led and managed by an industry volunteer. CII supports specific deliverables (e.g., video production, white paper editing).

AWP Data Standards JWG

AWP-Lean JWG

Development (CII managed)

Initiatives that address professional development and networking. Developed in collaboration with members and managed by CII staff.

CII Bootcamp

NextGen initiative

 

Appendix B - Examples of Recent Initiatives

Research Initiatives

Implementation-driven/ Benchmarking

Current CII Best Practices

 

Technology-focused

 

Safety

 

Other

RT-390, AWP - Execution Planning Guide

RT-398 A Fit-for-Purpose Handbook for Effective Implementation of CII BPs

RT-410 Evaluating the Implementation and Value of CII Best Practices

RT-420 Implementation of CII BPs for Small Projects

RT-421 Advanced Planning Guide for Modularization

RT-406, Rethinking Quality Management for Capital Projects

RT-413 Guidelines for a Supplier Qualification Program

RT-432 Streamlining and improving the efficiency of FEP

RT-433 Advanced Project Controls for AWP

RT-435 Alignment and Communication of Business Drivers in FEP

RT-403, Digital Transformation of the Capital Project Industry

RT-415 A Review of International Data Standards for Project Management Systems

RT-430 Model-Based Deliverables Guidelines for Capital Project Delivery

RT-412 A Refresh of CII’s Zero Accident Techniques (ZAT)

RT-422 Accelerating AI for Construction Safety

RT-431 Best Practices in Safety Communication and Training

RT-434 Improving Safety in Crane Operations

[Workforce] RT-414 Developing the Next Generation of Frontline Supervisors

[Decarbonization] RT-411 Decarbonization in the Construction of Capital Projects

[Workforce] RT-436 From Recruitment to Training: CII Member Pathways to Craft Workforce Success

Development Initiatives

Education

Working Groups

CII "NextGen" Initiative

Online Education and Badging

CII Bootcamp

Executive Leadership

Best Practices Course

AWP Data Standards

AWP-Lean JWG