Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this content. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 9 Next »

Status

IN PROGRESS

Contributors

Aleena Khatum Erika Feller Isaac Neideffer

Approver

[Not Completed]

Due date

--

On this page

Previous Design

OldBoostConverter.png

Standard boost converter layout, swapping diode for GANFET on node from inductor to battery, which is a pretty standard edit.

Timeline

Decision 1: Boost vs Zeta vs Resonance

Option 1: Boost

Option 2: Zeta

Option 3: Resonance

Overview

Design already implemented, and tested so kinks are worked out. Only capable of boosting, and has a generally lower efficiency than other two options.

Capable of boosting or bucking, very standard circuit layout that wouldn’t take too much messing around to make work. Generally higher efficiency and smaller passive components than boost converter.

Can implement ZVS or “soft switching” which is intended to reduce or eliminate switching losses. Probably most efficient design, but only has this efficiency at relatively small input voltage ranges in basic designs. There are slightly more complex versions that can handle large ranges of voltage inputs and maintain efficiency. Dr. Hanson has a really good paper over this which pretty much tells you how to design one of these.

Visual

OldBoostConverter.png

image-20241207-163838.png

image-20241207-163614.png

Pros and Cons

Simple Design

Already made and tested so no changes needed other than flyback concerns

Least efficient option

Simple Design

Very well known design and component requirements

Efficient

Can boost and buck

Needs to be designed and tested from scratch

Most efficient option

Can boost and buck

Dr. Hanson has a paper telling us how to make one that works for our purposes, he could be a valuable resource

Slightly more complex design

More difficult to design and implement

I am going to design the circuit using the resonance converter for now. The only concern that I have is that resonance converters are known to lose efficiency outside of specific input ranges. However the circuit topology I am choosing to use should be capable of maintaining high efficiency at larger input ranges.

ZVS Converter Spice Simulation

I am using LTSpice to simulate the converter with a python library that interfaces with it.

The trickiest part of setting up the simulation is setting duty cycles for the switches since the cycles are somewhat dependent on factors within the converter. However there are only two cycles which are controlled by the user. These are the first two of the six cycles, after which the switches are not touched and all switching occurs in the diodes. The time for the subsequent cycles must be determined with spice. However, there will also be some control circuitry used to optimize the timing of this cycle.

Engineering Diary

Check out Dr. Hanson's paper on a ZVS resonance converter design he made:

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7749103

Good video that explains Zeta Converters:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klcNgH715pk

Video that explains Boost Converter:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QM55r5fnUk
  • No labels