Archival Management System Evaluation Matrix

Archival Management System Evaluation Matrix

Feature Category

Criterion

AtoM

ArchivesSpace

Meta

Open Source

Yes

Yes

User Support

Yes- user base in google groups:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/ica-atom-users

Membership allows access to technical support.

Training & consultation

It doesn't offer training, but it allows consultations via e-mail or

google groups

Yes, with membership

http://www.archivesspace.org/trainingconsultations

Technical documentation

 

Membership allows access to technical support.

System Requirements

 

 

Backup/ restore utility

 

 

Hosting Available?

Yes, with fee

Yes, by Lyrasis, with fee:

http://www.lyrasis.org/LYRASIS%20Digital/Pages/ArchivesSpace.aspx

Demo/ Sandbox Available?

http://demo.accesstomemory.org/

http://www.archivesspace.org/sandbox

Migration support?

Yes, with fee

Membership provides migration tools from AT and Archon. Does membership would also support other migration sources?

http://www.archivesspace.org/migrations

Importing/ Exporting Metadata

Exports MARC

No. Possible future release, but nothing official.

Yes (MARC xml). Bugs reported that need to be fixed.

Exports EAD

Yes. Bugs identified when tested, also will have to be customized to our TARO EAD template

Yes. Bugs reported that need to be fixed. Also, it will  need to be customized to our TARO EAD template

Exports Dublin Core

Provides the functionality (not tested)

No

Exports MODS

If the administrator has set the default archival description template to MODS, this will also appear as an export option (not tested)

No

Exports METS

No

Short-term development target: Extend METS exports to include file, rights, and event metadata

Exports MADS

No

No

Exports EAC

Yes (not tested)

Yes (not tested)

Exports SKOS

From the subjects and places modules (not tested)

No

Batch Exports EAD

No documentation found

No documentation found

Batch Exports MARC

No

No documentation found

Batch Export Tab Delimited Files

No documentation found

No documentation found

Imports EAD

Yes. Tested and there isn't a one to one match between our EAD template and AtoM fields. Would need to be customized

Yes, but bugs reported that need to be fixed.

EAD import/export map: http://www.archivesspace.org/importexport

Imports MARC

No

Yes (not tested)

MARCXML import/export map: http://www.archivesspace.org/importexport

Imports Tab Delimited Files/ CSV

Yes. AtoM provides a csv template for the import, but didn't work correctly when tested

Yes (not tested)

Imports Digital Image Files

Yes; Digital Objects get embeded on the hyerarchical structure; formats supported: https://www.accesstomemory.org/en/docs/2.1/user-manual/import-export/upload-digital-object/#file-formats

Yes (not tested)

Digital Object CSV map and template: http://www.archivesspace.org/importexport

Import Accession Data

Yes. AtoM provides a csv template for the import, but didn't work correctly when tested

Yes, CSV only. Short-term development target: Create XML import for accession data

Accession CSV map and template: http://www.archivesspace.org/importexport

Batch Import EAD

Yes (not tested)

Yes (not tested)

Batch Import MARC

No

No documentation found

Batch Import CSV

Yes (not tested)

Yes (not tested)

Collection Management

Appraisals

 

 

Accessions

Managed on their own module

Managed on their own module

Create Deeds of Gift

No documentation found

No documentation found

Prioritize Processing Order

Yes, and also indicate the processing status

Yes, and also indicate the processing status

Track Donors

Donors are managed on their own module

No documentation found

Project Management

Some fields for project management on Accessions module

Looks like it can be done from the Accessions module and the Resource module

Record Condition

No specific area

On the accessions module

Manage Locations

Physical storage managed on its own module

Yale is developing new features on the locations module, will have to see if it meets our needs

Manage Restricted Materials

No documentation found

Restricted material is marked, and it allows to narrow search

Manage Rights

Right holders are managed on its own module

Yes

Manage Loans & Exhibits

No documentation found

Yes, from the locations module

Separations

From the Archival Descriptions and the accession record

"Disposition" field in Accession record, and "Separated material" in Resource record

Destructions

From the Archival Descriptions and the accession record

 

De-Accessioning

A de-accession can be done directly from the accession record

From the Archival Descriptions and the accession record

Reference Support

No documentation found

No documentation found

Generate Reports

Reports for file lists, item lists, physical storage locations and box labels

Short term development target: Implement a reporting module that will enable archivists to modify and save default reports, to create new reports, and to share reports

Define many default reports, including some replicating and updating reports in the Archivists’ Toolkit and new reports for new modules and functions in ArchivesSpace

Track Repository Statistics

No documentation found

No documentation found

Resource Description

TARO and OCLC ID#

Yes. Supports multiple unit ID's.

 

Authority Control

Authorities managed on their own module EAC-CPF

Authorities managed on their own module EAC-CPF

Controlled vocabulary

Subjects and Places managed on their own module

Subjects (including places) managed on their own module

Compliance to Archival Standards

ICA standards, DACS, RAD, Dublin Core, MODS

 

Data Validation

 

 

Templating / Default Fields

Yes

Yes

Support for Digital Media

 

 

Internationalization

Multilingual options

Multilingual?

Flexibility of Data Model

Yes

Yes

Item-level Description

Yes

Yes

Reorganize Hierarchies

Yes. Needs to be done directly from the item level

Yes

Dynamically generate EAD finding aids

 

 

Publish finding aids online

Yes, with public interface.

Yes, with public interface.

TARO EAD preview or internal validation

No. Would still require Oxygen for preview.

Can export unpublished finding aids as pdf from sandbox, though since it doesn't have the TARO style sheet it looks different from a TARO preview.

Administrative Functions

User Permissions

 

 

Support for Harvesting/ Syndication

 

 

Customization / Configuration

 

 

Spell Check

 

 

Bug Reporting

 

 

Interoperability with Digital Repository Systems

 

 

Multi-repository support?

Yes and no. Some limited functionality.

Yes (not tested)

User Interface

Web Publishing

 

 

Browse

Archival Descriptions, Authorities, Archival Institutions, subjects, places, digital objects and functions

Accessions, Resources, Digital Objects, Subjects, Agents, Locations, Events, Collection, Clasification

Search

Gobal or by repository

Yes

Advanced Search

Yes

Yes

Customizable

Yes. In-house or supported with fee

Yes. In-house or supported with fee (only members)

Built-in Help

Pop up notes referring to DACS rules; should be customizable to in-house interpretation of the rules

Yes. With membership; also, pop up notes referring to DACS rules; should be customizable to in-house interpretation of the rules

Link to Images & Other Files

Yes

 

Easy Data Entry

Interface somewhat clunky for data entry.

Data entry is kind of similar to AtoM. Rapid data entry option does alleviate somewhat.

Repositories we have contacted

 

  • WorldBank

  • Dumbarton Oaks

  • New Orleans Jazz and Heritage Center

Google hangout session: 2014-10-29 Meeting notes ADWG