Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Current »

Explanation of Review:

For the Faculty Annual Review we must provide (a) an assessment of each faculty members’ level of activity in each area of contribution, and (b) ratings of their overall contributions. Below is information about the rating scheme.

Assessment of activity levels:

Teaching assessment (T):            

2 = Exceeds expectations 1 = Meets expectations                 0 = Does not meet expectations

Service activity levels (S):

2 = Highly Active                                               1 = Moderately Active                    0 = Inactive

Diversity (D):

2 = Exceeds expectations             1 = Meets expectations                 0 = Does not meet expectations

Research activity levels (R):         

2 = Highly Active                                   1 = Moderately Active                    0 = Inactive


Ratings:  Letter / Numeric-decimal

E / 3 = exceeds expectations

M / 2 = meets expectations

DNM / 1 = does not meet expectations

US / 0 = unsatisfactory

N/A = Not applicable

  • No labels