Label Description Notes acl clausal modifier of noun (adjectival clause) Summary: This seems accurate. It is locking onto clausal modifiers that are either finite or non-finite. For example, “el perrito que le está mirando”. advcl adverbial clause modifier Summary: Majority of advcl are being OVER identified in Spanish and Catalan samples. It is marking some dependencies correctly, others not. It is correctly capturing adverbial clause modifiers. For example, “hay una pareja haciendo…”. But, this value has other errors: It is marking null subject clauses as advcl. “Una casa. Se ve grande. Tiene un garaje.” It is marking discourse markers/interjections as advcl. “Sí.” advmod adverbial modifier amod adjectival modifier appos appositional modifier aux auxiliary case case marking cc coordinating conjunction ccomp clausal complement Summary: This measure looks accurate. It is correctly capturing clausul complements. For example, “se supone que proyecta”. clf classifier compound compound conj conjunct cop copula csubj clausal subject Summary: Very inaccurate. It is overmarking verbs as clausal subjects. It is marking infinitives as subjects even when they are not. “No estar en contacto con la hierba”. It is marking null subject finite verbs as subjects even when they are not.” “Tienen” dep unspecified dependency det determiner discourse discourse element dislocated dislocated elements expl expletive fixed fixed multiword expression flat flat multiword expression goeswith goes with iobj indirect object list list mark marker Summary: This seems to be less accurate. It is frequently tagging interjections as mark even if they are not being used as markers of a clause. For example, “pues… estamos ante de…”. nmod nominal modifier Summary: This seems to be largely accurate. It is being caught for cases of a noun with a prepositional phrase. For example, “paisaje de naturaleza”. nsubj nominal subject nummod numeric modifier obj object obl oblique nominal orphan orphan parataxis parataxis punct punctuation reparandum overridden disfluency root root vocative vocative xcomp open clausal complement Summary: This seems to be working, though the majority of the cases are restricted to one specific use within the xcomp definition (“look”, “seem” / “parecer”). So, this seems to be accurate. For example, “parecen las sierras de montserrat”. Missing dependencies from list Kesha provided: acomp, csubjpass, pobj, complm, infmod, partmod Additionally, we can see these dependencies in table format from this website: For understanding the tree-like dependency structures that are available as output, they also provide a guide in interpreting the dependency relationships at this website: For example, here are relative clauses: