Guidelines for Grading ChE 385 & 685
Fall 2023 the ChE GSC voted to adopt the following guidelines for grading ChE 385 and ChE 685. View Guidelines below:
Chemical Engineering Research 385/685 - Student Expectations and Grading Guidelines
Grades reflect student learning in academic and research progress toward degree milestones including advancing to candidacy, the dissertation, and defense. Grades are not direct quantifiers of publications or other outcomes, as these may vary by individual research projects. Thus, the interpretation of research grades, as agreed upon by the Chemical Engineering faculty, can reflect a variety of types of student training activities towards their dissertations, including:
- Research discussions and one-on-one meetings with faculty advisors or collaborators to discuss research directions, fellowship applications, degree requirements, review data and manuscripts, etc.
- Organization and execution of research plans
- Initiative, independence, and creativity in research ideas, planning, and approach
- Mastery of new research skills or techniques to advance dissertation research (experimental, computational, or theoretical)
- Familiarity with and understanding of the established and emerging literature
- Thesis chapter or manuscript preparation, or other technical writing training
- Participation in, and research presented at, group, center, collaboration, or other meetings
- Research presentations and networking at scientific conferences and meetings
- Engagement in and management of collaborations with other faculty, students, or external parties, where relevant
- Additional lab-specific requirements may be added as agreed upon by PI and student
A | Good progress is being made in research expertise (specific skills and ability to plan a research strategy). Student’s trajectory is good for on-time dissertation preparation. |
A- | Student’s development of expertise or independence are impeded, but student/advisor have a plan for how to navigate and course correction is anticipated. No delays towards the dissertation are expected. |
B+ | Student’s achievement of intellectual expertise and independence are not at expected levels at this point in training. Dissertation progress is delayed, but the advisor and student are working together and expect significant improvement in the coming semester. |
B | There have been major delays in dissertation progress related to the student’s abilities, approach, or effort towards their dissertation. This grade signifies a significant concern on the part of the advisor. Discussion with Department Graduate Adviser is strongly advised. |
B- | Appropriate progress towards the degree is not being made. Discussion with the Department Graduate Adviser is necessary regarding plans and alternatives. If this grade brings a student’s GPA below 3.00, it will result in a warning by the Office of Graduate Studies that continuance in the Graduate School is in jeopardy. |
X | Incomplete. The student has made sufficient progress for a period of time, but has not completed educational objectives for the semester due to absence or other extenuating circumstances. Coursework must be completed by the end of the next term in order to receive a passing grade. |