2024 PDR Notes
LHRS 2024-2026 Mechanical PDR Notes
Dynamics
Suspension - Kinematics
Make sure to reevaluate bump steer considerations
Not just when wheels are pointing straight, but also at steer
LOOK AT ZOOM COMMENTS FOR MORE DETAILS
Suspension - Bell Cranks
Consider the pivot bearing stack up
Should consider running bearings over bushings - tapered or roller bearings
Off axis load vectors for manufacturing tolerance in Ansys
How much misalignment can you have with the shock/bellcrank connection
Make sure to consider during manufacturing and making the jig
Motion ratio looks to decrease as bump increases
This will cancel out the progressiveness of the shock
Suspension - Carbon Fiber Pushrod
Be sure to consider the joints and inserts
Chicken pins
Make sure to determine the weight of the two options before going with carbon
Combustion was doing buckling tests, didn’t have buckling tube failure, it was that the adhesive sheared and it would start to flail
Adhesive still matters and pure buckling of the tube will probably not be the main failure mode
Best bet is to do empirical testing
CF in compression is weird
Make sure to verify truss solver
Suspension - Rear Trailing Arm
Need to implement method to adjust toe and camber with the trailing arm
Can’t rely on perfect manufacturing
Eccentric bolts will help with this - pushes the bolt up and down and forward and aft; pushes mounting spots up and down and in and out simultaneously (make sure Brian does not have a problem with it)
To measure alignment, you can use strings, have to figure out a datum for a center to alight wheel to centerline, use toe plates in the front (tells tow between the wheels, not to the centerline of the car)
100 thou wall thickness as a guess - the singular tube will bear all of the load of the tube, need to make sure that tube can handle torque
There will be a significant challenge with getting the two mounting holes to be concentric with each other
It would be good to be able to adjust the ride height at the rear
With coil shocks can adjust the preload
Same progressiveness might be a good idea between the front and rear for the pitch and roll
Suspension - Shock Selection
Look at other comments
Suspension - Control Arms and Apexes
Put more thought into how you will jig the control arms
Didn’t actually have much issue with warping of the bearing bore during welding
Heat sinks in the bearing bore while welding
Outsourced apexes will still require jigging
Why mild steel over chromoly?
There are some issues with chromoly having loss of strength with welds but you will have a thinner tube wall thickness - chromoly is the better option
Make sure positioning of the snap ring grooves are correct
If you use a high misalignment spherical bearing it won’t clear the ring
There are specific high clearance internal snap rings but you need to be aware of the actual travel and misalignment
You’re going to have less misalignment than what the bearing specifies because of the snap rings and spacers
Steering - General
How are you considering steering efforts
You need to know the gear ratio before designing the gearbox
Need to reconsider why you’re using a gearbox
Gearbox is a whole can of worms and is difficult to implement and maintain
If you can find a way to use u joints
You’re in a good position to
Might want to consider angling the steering wheel more (like a 45 degree angle) - this will allow you reduce perceived steering effort and bring you to the range of angles where a stack of u joints is usable
The cardan effect can help you ; end of travel doesn’t matter except at the u turn test
Make sure the inserts are a through hole
Brian puts emphasis on…
Static friction makes driving more difficult
Look at Chris’s other comments
Steering - Rack Selection
Make sure to compare steering ratio with what you did last year to have a reference for what the steering ratio and effort are
Steering lever length is a big factor, rack speed affects how fast you turn but you can have a combo of rack speed and steering lever length that can affect steering ratio (rack speed is not the only large)
You can do FDB with torque at the wheel with tie rods resisting that torque to determine steering effort - everything is just a torque
In the past we had static friction at the wheel
Steering - Bevel Gears, bearings, and shafts
key way depth looks pretty close to inner diameter of the tube - keyway greatly reduces strength, so you might want to reduce inner diameter of tube
Why tapered roller bearings?
The tapered bearings are overkill - will also have a lot of drag in those bearings
All of these components might make the assembly quite heavy
Make sure you properly characterize the loads going through this assembly
It seems you are designing backwards - you need to characterize the loads first and inform the design based off that
You have a twisting force but how much of those loads are actually being transmitted to the bearings
Thrust bearing and washer handles the axial force
Unsprung - General
Beware of steering compliance with outboard steering arm
Refer to Chris’s Zoom comments
Actually prefer having a hub and axle so that the hub doesn’t take as much of the bending load - the axle will take all of the bending load
Separated the bearings axially as much as possible with the bearings on top of the contact patch
Unsprung - Hubs
Seem difficult to manufacture
The lightening pattern for the brake rotor carrier will require a very long and thin end mill
Make sure to turn the spindle and wheel locating in the same operation
Spindle calculation
Have you considered camber deflection under loads
Hub seems very cantilevered - will cause some issues with interferences especially with brakes
Unsprung - Uprights
Consider having ears instead of the current caliper mount design
Consider just using lugs for caliper mounting
Make sure to put more thought into the wheel cover
The pickup should be a fairly simple part; implement the angle in the upright itself to make the pickup easier to manufacture
Hole in steering arm will be hard to access
Understand the drawbacks of setting camber at your outboard pickups vs inboard
Unsprung - Tire Selection
Michelins are a good alternative
Michelins don’t last as long
The Shinkos have much more grip, very noticeable compared to the Michelins
Unsprung - Bearing Selection
Bigger bearings are worse for rolling resistance
Consider reamed holes and
Double row angular contact bearings work pretty well
It’s just one package with two rows that are spread pretty far apart; can be relatively heavy
Is there a reason for having the bearings so close together
The load sharing between the two bearings are very small
The reason you use two is so you’re not driving the moment on one bearing, but since the bearing is so close together it eliminates that purpose
Zero benefit regarding camber moment as well
Preload sensitivity was very bad with tapered roller bearings
First determine overall geometry of the system
What is bounding your problem, then determine the loads, then start thinking about geometry and bearing
Unsprung - Brakes
Why are you not taking the max load case from the tires
You are designing with a level of conservation way higher than needed
Brake FEA approach is a little simplistic
Contact stress from buttons with uneven load sharing between buttons
Need to couple this with hand calcs
You’re going to have to waterjet the button locations undersized and then go back and precision machine
Contact stress is greatly affected by the width - sensitive to the thou
Manufacturing brake disc introduces a lot of challenges
Cast iron will probably only work if it was fully machined
Need to consider more than yield and ultimate stress when choosing material
Water jetting introduces a lot of micro cracks, and cast iron is very brittle
Has had good results with 4130 or 4140 waterjetted and precision ground
Go from the tire and understand what pad compounds; don’t over caliper yourself
Body
Frame - General
Review Zoom comments for more
Have you looked at tubes getting crushed because of the thinner wall thickness
Start with a hand calc looking at the contact area
Can run FEA with a split face and force being applied there - ask Jacob for more details
Ask Nathan and Jacob for their comments, as I was not able to write most of their comments down due to a technical difficulty
Has the truss solver been validated
Might be helpful to have the bottom tubes be rectangular for ease of setup on the optical table
Frame - Egress
Don’t limit yourself to a top load roll hoop. If you want weight reduction you could do so by making a more compact roll cage with forward loading
Frame - Roll Cage & Occupant Cell
Split top roll hoop might bring up issues with Bill and Brian
Make sure you have something keeping the head of the driver from moving side to side outside of the roll cage
Frame - Material Selection
Frame - Tabs
Frame - Simulation
Frame - Jig
There can be a lot of slop with the jigs mounted on the vertical t bar, especially at the bolts
How are you going to be sure that the tab placements and angles will be achieved with the jig?
Keep in mind that the 3D print has a tendency to warp
Is there a reason why you’re only constraining the T bar using two L brackets?
There is a torsion aspect
Two free spinning ends with a locking mechanism might help with accessibility
Ergo - Driver Positioning
Current driving position seems uncomfortable
Clarify the reg about the angle of the seat back
Ergo - Steering Wheel
Why no 3D printed components? Making a forced CF still as some challenges and touching CF is still not the most pleasant
We might drop weight by a little, but CF can be a little finicky, so is the upside enough to outweigh the downsides?
While the test part you made was fairly easy, complexity will increase as the contours and size increase
Ergo - Pedal Box
Introduce a spring and mechanical stop in the middle so that on a certain regime the spring will compress which will provide force to the calipers
Make it position driven rather than force driven
Keep in mind that welding will normalize the aluminum (no longer T6) and drops the yield strength by 5 times
Make sure to be mindful of the connections so that when the driver egresses, they don’t rip them off
Beware of the adjustability - this will lengthen the driver changes and will probably send you back to the garage instead of staying in the pit wall for the change
Consider just having one position and narrowing the median of drivers, at least on a yearly basis
This also puts loads on the pins, not only are the pedals going to take the load. You will have to do more FEA to assure the pins won’t fail
You should reconsider not having a belly pan under the pedal box - might not be allowable by regs too
Ergo - Belly Pan
Be mindful of the foam compressing
Critical fasteners for the ones fastening the belly pan - need to have a locking mechanism
Ergo - Seat
Ergo - Ballast Box
Make sure to look at the hinge and hardware ratings to make sure that the ballast won’t fly out by a hardware failure - look at the loads and run hand calcs
Make sure that the ballast box is accessible by the driver during the swap or accessible with the canopy open so you can swap ballast at the pit wall
Consider having a hole at the top of the box so officials can see what ballast is in the box; just make sure the hole is not large enough for the ballast to come through