13.4 Kinematic Analysis
Mechanism Description
The robot uses an inverted slider-crank mechanism, where contraction of the elastic elements drives the slider outward, producing vertical leg extension and lift-off.
Link lengths used in the analysis:
l1=4l_1 = 4l1=4
l2=5.0l_2 = 5.0l2=5.0
l3=3.5l_3 = 3.5l3=3.5
Mechanical Advantage Analysis
A mechanical advantage (MA) analysis was performed to understand force transmission throughout the motion. Results show that the mechanism exhibits lower mechanical advantage in the highly compressed configuration, with output force increasing as the mechanism extends. As the linkage approaches its straighter configuration, the mechanical advantage improves, producing larger output forces near full extension.
This behavior is ideal for jumping, as it concentrates force output near takeoff while allowing energy to be stored over a longer actuator stroke.
Key Insight
The inverted slider-crank trades speed for force near its singular configuration, making it well-suited for impulsive energy release but highly sensitive to alignment, friction, and manufacturing imperfections.
Motor Torque Calculations (For DC Motor) - The purpose of this was to select the required motor driver, motor and battery for our jumping robot
Summary of Tables
To make sure that we choose the correct DC motor to tighten the pulley (have adequate torque and speed), we calculated the optimal motor speed characteristics, from weight and friction assumptions of the jumping robot, and jumping height and time to tighten requirements. The motor never stalled (even with 15 rubber bands). The failures of this mechanism came from the geometric design under high loading conditions.
Table A: Geometric Factors (Note that the highlighted components are the factors that we are trying to optimize through selection of electronic components
| in | mm |
Jumping Height Requirement | 18 | 457.2 |
|
|
|
| lb | kg |
Lower Weight Max | 0.5 | 0.226796 |
|
|
|
Upper Weight Extraneous | 1.5 | 0.680388 |
Motor Weight |
| 0.091 |
|
|
|
Battery Weight | 1.54 | 0.15 |
|
| |
Total Upper Weight Mass |
| 0.921388 |
|
|
|
| Geometry (mm) | Geometry (cm) |
Motor Shaft Radius | 4 | 0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stored Potential Energy | lbf | Newtons |
Force | 80 | 355.8576 |
| cm | m |
Distance Stretched | 25.4 | 0.254 |
Rough k constant | 1401.014173 |
|
Table B: Torque Speed Curve Calculations
Motor- Speed Calcs | This is for determining which motor we want to use |
|
| I.e This basically uses the torque speed curved of the motor (based on the two variables no load rpm and stall torque), assuming there is always a force of a the weight in lbs |
|
Consideration One: |
|
|
Medium Powered Motor |
|
|
Pololu Metal Gearmotor Medium Power |
|
|
|
| |
DC Voltage | 12 |
|
Voltage Loss (Motor Driver) | 2 |
|
Input DC Voltage | 10 |
|
Loss Ratio | 0.8333333333 |
|
No Load RPM (intercept) | 100 | RPM |
Stall Torque | 29 | kg/cm |
No Load RPM (intercept) | 83.33333333 | RPM |
Stall Torque | 24.16666667 | kg/cm |
DC Voltage | 12V |
|
Amperage | 1.8A |
|
|
|
|
Slope | -3.448275862 |
|
Intercept | 83.33333333 |
|
Weight (lbs) | 80 |
|
Torque @ Weight | 14.514944 |
|
RPM | 33.2818023 |
|
Length (cm) | 25.4 | cm |
|
|
|
Shaft Circumference | 2.513274123 |
|
|
|
|
Time to Fully Lock at Speed (s) | 18.2195762 |
|
Table C: Kinematic analysis using Calculated Values
Potential Energy without Losses | 45.1939152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential Energy With Losses | 33.8954364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Gravity Loss | 2.29351901 |
| m * g * h formula |
|
|
|
|
Power Before Collision | 31.60191739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Velocity Before Collision | 8.282290108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Velocity After Collision | 6.646323863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gravity | 9.8 |
|
|
time | 1.164642703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final Position | 1.094268724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Around 14.17 inches |
|
|
|