13.4 Kinematic Analysis

13.4 Kinematic Analysis

 

Mechanism Description

The robot uses an inverted slider-crank mechanism, where contraction of the elastic elements drives the slider outward, producing vertical leg extension and lift-off.

Link lengths used in the analysis:

  • l1=4l_1 = 4l1​=4

  • l2=5.0l_2 = 5.0l2​=5.0

  • l3=3.5l_3 = 3.5l3​=3.5

 

Mechanical Advantage Analysis

A mechanical advantage (MA) analysis was performed to understand force transmission throughout the motion. Results show that the mechanism exhibits lower mechanical advantage in the highly compressed configuration, with output force increasing as the mechanism extends. As the linkage approaches its straighter configuration, the mechanical advantage improves, producing larger output forces near full extension.

This behavior is ideal for jumping, as it concentrates force output near takeoff while allowing energy to be stored over a longer actuator stroke.

Key Insight

The inverted slider-crank trades speed for force near its singular configuration, making it well-suited for impulsive energy release but highly sensitive to alignment, friction, and manufacturing imperfections.

Motor Torque Calculations (For DC Motor) - The purpose of this was to select the required motor driver, motor and battery for our jumping robot

Summary of Tables

To make sure that we choose the correct DC motor to tighten the pulley (have adequate torque and speed), we calculated the optimal motor speed characteristics, from weight and friction assumptions of the jumping robot, and jumping height and time to tighten requirements. The motor never stalled (even with 15 rubber bands). The failures of this mechanism came from the geometric design under high loading conditions.

Table A: Geometric Factors (Note that the highlighted components are the factors that we are trying to optimize through selection of electronic components

 

in

mm

Jumping Height Requirement

18

457.2

 

 

 

 

lb

kg

Lower Weight Max

0.5

0.226796

 

 

 

Upper Weight Extraneous

1.5

0.680388

Motor Weight

 

0.091

 

 

 

Battery Weight

1.54

0.15

Battery Amazon

 

 

Total Upper Weight Mass

 

0.921388

 

 

 

 

Geometry (mm)

Geometry (cm)

Motor Shaft Radius

4

0.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stored Potential Energy

lbf

Newtons

Force

80

355.8576

 

cm

m

Distance Stretched

25.4

0.254

Rough k constant

1401.014173

 

Table B: Torque Speed Curve Calculations

Motor- Speed Calcs

This is for determining which motor we want to use

 

 

I.e This basically uses the torque speed curved of the motor (based on the two variables no load rpm and stall torque), assuming there is always a force of a the weight in lbs

 

Consideration One:

 

 

Medium Powered Motor

 

 

Pololu Metal Gearmotor Medium Power

 

 

https://www.pololu.com/product/3233

 

 

DC Voltage

12

 

Voltage Loss (Motor Driver)

2

 

Input DC Voltage

10

 

Loss Ratio

0.8333333333

 

No Load RPM (intercept)

100

RPM

Stall Torque

29

kg/cm

No Load RPM (intercept)

83.33333333

RPM

Stall Torque

24.16666667

kg/cm

DC Voltage

12V

 

Amperage

1.8A

 

 

 

 

Slope

-3.448275862

 

Intercept

83.33333333

 

Weight (lbs)

80

 

Torque @ Weight

14.514944

 

RPM

33.2818023

 

Length (cm)

25.4

cm

 

 

 

Shaft Circumference

2.513274123

 

 

 

 

Time to Fully Lock at Speed (s)

18.2195762

 

 

Table C: Kinematic analysis using Calculated Values

Potential Energy without Losses

45.1939152

 

 

 

 

 

 

Potential Energy With Losses

33.8954364

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Gravity Loss

2.29351901

 

m * g * h formula

 

 

 

 

Power Before Collision

31.60191739

 

 

 

 

 

 

Velocity Before Collision

8.282290108

 

 

 

 

 

 

Velocity After Collision

6.646323863

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gravity

9.8

 

 

time

1.164642703

 

 

 

 

 

 

Final Position

1.094268724

 

 

 

 

 

 

Around 14.17 inches